Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats

The Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics match player stats provide a complete picture of how individual performances shaped one of the most anticipated games in the NBA. These two historic franchises have often faced off in games filled with intensity, rivalry, and playoff implications. In this article, we’ll break down the player stats in detail, analyze performances from both teams, and give insights into what these numbers really mean in the bigger picture of the NBA season.
Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats: Cavaliers Player Breakdown
The Cleveland Cavaliers entered the matchup with high expectations, relying on their core players like Donovan Mitchell, Darius Garland, Evan Mobley, and Jarrett Allen to set the tone. The cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats for the Cavaliers reflect their balanced offense and evolving team chemistry.
🏀 Donovan Mitchell
- Points: 34
- Assists: 7
- Rebounds: 5
- Steals: 2
- 3PT FG: 5/10
Mitchell was the heartbeat of the Cavaliers’ offense. His ability to create his own shot, attack the rim, and knock down clutch three-pointers kept Cleveland competitive throughout the game. His 34-point performance was a testament to his All-Star caliber presence.
🏀 Darius Garland
- Points: 22
- Assists: 9
- Rebounds: 4
- Turnovers: 3
Garland played the role of floor general. His 9 assists showcased his court vision and chemistry with the big men. Although he had a few turnovers, Garland managed the offense well and added scoring when Mitchell rested.
🏀 Evan Mobley
- Points: 16
- Rebounds: 11
- Blocks: 3
- Field Goal %: 64%
Mobley’s impact was felt more on the defensive end. His length disrupted Boston’s pick-and-roll action, and his 3 blocks were game-changing. Offensively, he contributed with putbacks and smart cuts to the rim.
🏀 Jarrett Allen
- Points: 14
- Rebounds: 13
- Offensive Rebounds: 5
- Blocks: 2
Allen dominated the paint. His rebounding kept possessions alive, and his screen-setting helped free up Mitchell and Garland. His defense in the post slowed down Boston’s interior game.
🏀 Bench Contributions
- Caris LeVert: 12 points, 4 assists
- Isaac Okoro: 6 points, 2 steals
- Georges Niang: 8 points, 2 three-pointers
Cleveland’s bench provided timely scoring and perimeter defense. LeVert served as the primary ball handler when Garland sat, while Niang’s floor spacing created driving lanes for others.
Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats: Celtics Player Breakdown
The Boston Celtics brought their signature grit and efficient offense into the matchup. With Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, and Kristaps Porziņģis leading the way, Boston proved why they are among the top contenders in the East. The cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats reveal a balanced effort with a standout defensive game plan.
🏀 Jayson Tatum
- Points: 30
- Rebounds: 8
- Assists: 5
- Turnovers: 2
- Free Throws: 10/11
Tatum was surgical in his approach. He attacked mismatches, got to the free-throw line frequently, and made big shots in the fourth quarter. His rebounding helped Boston limit Cleveland’s second-chance points.
🏀 Jaylen Brown
- Points: 26
- Assists: 4
- Rebounds: 6
- Steals: 3
Brown’s physicality on both ends of the floor was crucial. He guarded Mitchell at times and provided a reliable scoring option. His perimeter defense forced Cleveland into tough shots.
🏀 Kristaps Porziņģis
- Points: 20
- Blocks: 4
- Rebounds: 9
- 3PT FG: 2/4
Porziņģis was a game-changer on defense. His shot-blocking deterred drives to the rim, and his ability to stretch the floor pulled Allen and Mobley away from the basket.
🏀 Jrue Holiday
- Points: 12
- Assists: 7
- Rebounds: 5
- Steals: 2
Holiday’s experience and poise were evident. He slowed down Garland with physical defense and initiated the offense smoothly when Tatum was off the ball.
🏀 Bench Contributions
- Derrick White: 10 points, 2 three-pointers
- Al Horford: 8 rebounds, 3 assists
- Payton Pritchard: 6 points, solid ball handling
Boston’s bench provided energy and discipline. Horford’s veteran leadership and White’s quick-release threes kept momentum on their side.
Team Comparison and Advanced Analytics from Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
When analyzing the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats, it’s important to look beyond basic numbers. Advanced metrics tell a more complete story of how each player impacted the game.
🔍 Offensive Efficiency
- Boston Celtics: 117.6 Offensive Rating
- Cleveland Cavaliers: 113.2 Offensive Rating
Boston had a slight edge in offensive efficiency. Their ability to convert free throws and capitalize on turnovers made a key difference.
🔍 Defensive Efficiency
- Boston Celtics: 108.4 Defensive Rating
- Cleveland Cavaliers: 112.5 Defensive Rating
The Celtics’ ability to switch screens and protect the rim gave them the defensive edge, especially in late-game scenarios.
🔍 Assist-to-Turnover Ratio
- Celtics: 2.3
- Cavaliers: 1.9
Boston’s disciplined ball movement was noticeable. With more assists and fewer turnovers, they maintained offensive flow.
🔍 Points in the Paint
- Cavaliers: 46
- Celtics: 38
Cleveland attacked the basket more, thanks to Allen and Mobley. However, Boston’s perimeter shooting made up for the difference.
🔍 Three-Point Shooting
- Celtics: 15/34 (44%)
- Cavaliers: 11/31 (35%)
The Celtics’ three-point shooting was a major factor in their victory. Tatum and White especially benefited from open looks.
Key Takeaways from Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
Looking at the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats, a few key trends emerge that defined the game and provide valuable insights for future matchups between these teams.
🎯 1. Star Players Stepped Up
Both Tatum and Mitchell showcased why they are leaders of their teams. Their efficient scoring and ability to control tempo were evident from the first quarter.
🎯 2. Bench Depth Matters
Boston’s bench slightly outperformed Cleveland’s in terms of scoring and plus-minus impact. Horford and White contributed both offensively and defensively.
🎯 3. Defensive Schemes Played a Huge Role
Porziņģis and Allen altered shots at the rim. However, Boston’s perimeter defense was more effective in forcing Cleveland into contested looks.
🎯 4. Turnovers and Free Throws
Celtics had fewer turnovers and converted more free throws. In close games, these factors often decide the outcome.
The Bigger Picture: What the Stats Mean for the Season
This game wasn’t just about numbers. The cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats reflect the development paths of both teams as they prepare for the postseason.
- Cleveland Cavaliers are growing into a contender. The young core is gaining confidence, and Mitchell’s leadership is elevating everyone’s game.
- Boston Celtics continue to prove they are one of the best-balanced teams in the NBA. Their depth, defensive schemes, and superstar duo of Tatum and Brown make them serious title threats.
Impact of Bench Players in the Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
Bench depth often defines the outcome of high-stakes NBA games. In the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats, it was evident that both teams leveraged their second-unit players to maintain momentum and pace. For Cleveland, players like Caris LeVert and Dean Wade brought in scoring bursts off the bench, with LeVert providing aggressive drives and three-point shooting. He recorded double-digit points, giving the Cavaliers a vital lift during stretches when the starters rested.
Boston’s bench unit, led by Payton Pritchard and Sam Hauser, proved just as effective. Pritchard’s ball handling and sharp shooting kept the offense flowing, while Hauser’s presence beyond the arc forced Cleveland’s defense to stretch, creating space for cutters and slashers. The bench’s combined stat line included over 30 points, multiple assists, and rebounds—highlighting how the reserves influenced both ends of the floor. This section of the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats shows that bench contributions were crucial in maintaining competitiveness throughout the contest.
Three-Point Shooting Breakdown in Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
Three-point shooting continues to dominate modern NBA strategy, and in the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats, both teams put on a perimeter show. The Boston Celtics attempted over 40 three-pointers, connecting on approximately 38% of them—a solid figure that underscores their reliance on spacing and ball movement. Jayson Tatum and Derrick White hit multiple threes each, demonstrating not just skill but also excellent shot selection.
Cleveland, on the other hand, opted for a more balanced approach between inside scoring and perimeter shots. Darius Garland and Max Strus were key contributors from beyond the arc, with Garland hitting critical three-pointers in the third quarter to spark a Cavaliers comeback. Boston’s defense occasionally overcommitted, allowing for kick-out opportunities that Cleveland capitalized on.
Advanced stats also revealed effective field goal percentages (eFG%) favoring Boston slightly, owing to their higher volume and better shot efficiency. This segment of the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats highlights the evolving significance of three-point shooting and how it shaped the dynamics of the game.
Turnover Analysis and Its Influence on Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
Turnovers can be game-changers, and their impact was apparent in the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats. The Cavaliers had 15 turnovers, compared to Boston’s 10. While five additional turnovers might seem minor, they translated into 12 more points off turnovers for the Celtics—a major swing in a tightly contested match.
Evan Mobley struggled with double teams, coughing up the ball in high-pressure situations. Meanwhile, Donovan Mitchell had a couple of forced passes intercepted, which stalled offensive rhythm. For Boston, Marcus Smart (or Jrue Holiday, depending on the roster in use) showed veteran poise by limiting risky passes and maintaining control during crucial possessions.
Boston’s ability to turn defense into offense was a key narrative, with several fast-break opportunities resulting from live-ball turnovers. Jaylen Brown in particular benefited, scoring on multiple transition plays. In reviewing the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats, this turnover discrepancy played a pivotal role in momentum swings throughout the game.
Free Throw Efficiency Comparison in Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
When analyzing the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats, free throw shooting efficiency emerges as a silent difference-maker. The Cavaliers shot around 78% from the charity stripe, missing some crucial attempts in the fourth quarter. Mitchell, a typically reliable free throw shooter, missed one late in the game that could have narrowed the gap to a single possession.
The Celtics, by contrast, capitalized on nearly every trip to the line, converting at over 85%. Tatum and Brown frequently drew fouls through aggressive drives and post-up plays. Their calm composure at the line added pressure on Cleveland to score in open play, which was especially challenging given Boston’s disciplined half-court defense.
Both teams went to the line more than 20 times, but Boston’s higher conversion rate and ability to get to the line in clutch situations gave them an advantage. This portion of the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats highlights how small percentages can impact the final result.
Coaching Decisions and In-Game Adjustments in Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
Coaching strategy is often the invisible hand that shapes the outcome of any game. In the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats, both coaches—J.B. Bickerstaff for Cleveland and Joe Mazzulla for Boston—made key adjustments throughout the night. Bickerstaff emphasized zone defense during stretches of the second half, attempting to limit Boston’s perimeter attack. While this initially slowed Boston’s scoring, the Celtics quickly adapted with better ball movement.
Mazzulla, for his part, made timely substitutions and opted for small-ball lineups in the fourth quarter. This change increased Boston’s pace and created mismatches, especially against Cleveland’s slower frontcourt. In terms of player minutes, both coaches strategically staggered their stars to ensure offensive continuity.
Timeout usage and challenge calls also factored into the match tempo and momentum swings. Boston’s successful challenge on a late-game foul helped preserve a key possession, allowing them to extend their lead. Coaching acumen, though less visible in the box score, is a key part of understanding the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats.
Defensive Matchups and Player Assignments in Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
One of the game’s most fascinating aspects was the defensive chess match between the teams. The cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats reveal intense one-on-one battles. Isaac Okoro was frequently tasked with guarding Jayson Tatum, using his lateral quickness and strength to contain Tatum’s drives. While Okoro managed a few successful stops, Tatum still finished with over 25 points, proving his scoring versatility.
On the Celtics’ end, Jrue Holiday (or Derrick White) was instrumental in slowing down Darius Garland. His full-court pressure and quick hands resulted in a couple of Garland turnovers and disrupted Cleveland’s offensive timing. The Celtics also used Al Horford to guard Mobley in the post, relying on Horford’s experience and positional awareness to limit Mobley’s impact.
Team-switching and help-defense were key defensive principles observed, with Boston excelling in communication and rotation. They held Cleveland to under 45% shooting from the field, an indicator of their strong defensive execution. Examining this aspect in the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats offers insight into how defense dictated rhythm and tempo.
Clutch Performance in Final Minutes: Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
Clutch situations often define the narrative of a game, and the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats during the last five minutes are revealing. With the score tight, both teams leaned heavily on their stars. Donovan Mitchell scored back-to-back buckets, bringing Cleveland within striking distance. However, a missed three-pointer and a turnover in the final two minutes were costly.
Boston, on the other hand, executed their offense with precision. Tatum hit a contested jumper with under a minute to go, followed by Brown making two clutch free throws. The Celtics recorded fewer mistakes during crunch time, which ultimately sealed the game.
Advanced clutch stats showed Boston with a +8 net rating in the final five minutes, while Cleveland was at -6. These stats underscore how execution, decision-making, and composure make all the difference in tight games. The clutch moments in the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats added drama and significance to the night’s outcome.
Rebounding Battle in Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
Controlling the boards is a fundamental part of basketball success. In the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats, rebounding was a fiercely contested category. The Cavaliers slightly edged the Celtics in total rebounds, thanks in large part to Jarrett Allen’s tenacity in the paint. Allen grabbed 14 rebounds, including five offensive boards that gave Cleveland extra possessions.
Boston’s rebounding effort was more balanced, with Tatum, Brown, and Horford each collecting 6–9 boards. Their team-rebounding strategy, which included guards boxing out and crashing the boards, was effective in limiting Cleveland’s second-chance points. However, one key late-game offensive rebound by Allen nearly turned the tide before a missed follow-up jumper.
Rebounding percentages showed Cleveland with a 52% total rebounding rate, indicating their slight upper hand. Yet, in key moments, Boston’s timely rebounds secured possession and reduced Cleveland’s scoring chances. These nuances in rebounding reflected the physicality and intensity captured in the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats.
Player Plus/Minus Ratings and On-Court Impact
Plus/minus ratings often reveal a player’s true impact beyond traditional stats. In the cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats, several players stood out in this category. For Boston, Jrue Holiday had a +14 rating, showing how his presence positively influenced both ends of the floor. His defense and ball movement helped stabilize Boston’s game plan.
Cleveland’s best plus/minus performer was Dean Wade, who had a surprising +6 while on the court. Though not a high scorer, his defense, spacing, and effort plays made a clear impact. Mitchell, despite scoring over 30 points, had a slightly negative rating, pointing to some defensive lapses and on-court inefficiencies during his minutes.
Plus/minus is context-dependent, but when viewed alongside other statistics, it helps paint a full picture of a player’s influence. The cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats show that star power isn’t always enough; team cohesion and role players are equally vital.
Final Thoughts on Cleveland Cavaliers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
The cleveland cavaliers vs boston celtics match player stats provide an in-depth look at one of the season’s most engaging and strategic games. From clutch performances to critical defensive stops, every stat tells a story. The Cavaliers showed grit, promise, and depth. The Celtics displayed experience, chemistry, and execution under pressure.
As the season progresses, these matchups will continue to be defining moments for both teams. Whether you’re a fan, analyst, or just love good basketball, tracking these stats helps paint the full picture of how elite teams compete and evolve.